Thursday, September 26, 2019

3 Things to Do Before the Cross-examination of Expert Witnesses


Prosecutors should anticipate that the defense will present an expert witness, especially when the case requires medical, scientific, or technical knowledge. Conducting the cross-examination of expert witnesses will most likely be difficult since the counsels, the jury, and the judge do not necessarily possess the technical knowledge to understand every detail of expert testimony.
Today, David Serna discusses 3 ways and strategies prosecutors can use to effectively go about the cross-examination of expert witnesses.
1.       Know the common factual issues dealt with during the examination of expert witnesses

This may vary per State. It is necessary to know what issued may be raised. As a guide, Rule 702 of the Federal Rules on Evidence allows expert testimony when these three issues are raised: 1) whether the testimony is based on sufficient data or facts; 2) whether the testimony is the product of reliable methods and principles; and 3) whether the witness has applied the methods and principles reliably given the facts of the case.

David Serna says that prosecutors must prepare and pay attention if any of these three issues has been raised in the pleadings.

2.       Understand the topic or subject the expert testimony will cover

Lack of technical knowledge is indeed a limitation on the part of the prosecutor. To effectively ask questions during the cross-examination of expert witnesses, it is necessary that the prosecutor acquaints himself with basic knowledge on the subject matter.

That does not mean that he should read several books on the topic. A good source would be the State’s own expert witness. This should guide the prosecutor and trier of facts in understanding the technicalities in the expert testimony of the opponent’s witness.

3.       Know the background of the expert witness

After gathering information on the subject, the prosecutor must also know who the expert witness is. It is necessary to know if such witness is experienced, skilled, and credible. So much can be inferred from his employment history and educational background. 

Follow David Serna’s blogs for more tips on litigation, criminal law, defense, and prosecution.