Friday, August 30, 2019

Advice on Crafting Legal Briefs


A trial is a form of art. Like all kinds of performance, mastering it requires preparation. To be an effective trial lawyer, young lawyers should first know that writing persuasive legal briefs makes a sturdy foundation for trial. Today, David Serna shares his insights from over 40 years of experience as a trial lawyer.

1.       The court is your audience.

The jury and the judge are the readers of your pleadings, motions, and other documents. Making them understand and appreciate what you write and what you say are things all trial lawyers must do.

Knowing the environment where the trial takes place also matters. Visiting the courtroom will help acquaint you with the equipment it has. The equipment available is not uniform for all courts. Some have the latest technology while others don’t. Knowing what is available will help you build your presentation more efficiently.


2.       Brevity goes a long way.

The simpler, the better. David Serna believes that you are duty-bound, as a trial lawyer, to communicate with the court effectively. You must make time establishing a logical and clear argument.  Think of how to help the court understand your case. By avoiding technical and highfalutin words, you help the court grasps the facts you wish to establish, the cause of your case, and the relief your client seeks.

You are not only taking up your time. You are also taking up the time of the court. The court is burdened with a heavy workload. We don’t want to waste their time. Keep your briefs brief.

3.       Proofread.

Your first draft is rarely ever your final draft. Write and revise until you achieve the best and clearest flow for your argument. Being updated with the most recent key cases will help you, not only with advancing your client’s case, but also rebutting the opposing counsel’s defenses and objections. Be sure that the cases you cite are not incompletely quoted and to put them in the proper context.

3 Things Lawyers Must Do While Preparing for Trial


Lawyers must always thoroughly examine the evidence offered by both sides. Every piece of evidence and every testimony carries a specific objective. Lawyers must prudently consider the purpose to be carried out for each and prepare according to each set of goals.
David Serna believes these are the preliminary steps to a successful direct and cross-examination. Today, he discusses the three things all lawyers must do while preparing for trial.

1.       Keep in mind the objective you are achieving

Knowing and understanding the objective of the witness’ testimony will help you frame your questions, both for direct and cross-examination. Without definite objectives, you will only end up hurting your case.

When conducting a direct examination, for instance, the objective is to build a story and to make the jury remember that version of the story. On the other hand, when conducting a cross-examination, the counsels must be gauge whether the witness will harm or help their side of the case. If it is more harmful than helpful, the lawyer should dispense with cross-examination.

2.       Understand the challenges confronting each side of the case

Each side of the case has its strengths and weaknesses. Lawyers must always be at least one step ahead of their opponent. David Serna says that they must be able to anticipate the defenses, rebuttals, and objections that will be set up against their witnesses and evidence.

For instance, if you are the prosecutor, you must remember that the defense counsel’s tactics will involve undermining the State’s case. On the other hand, if you are the defense counsel, you must remember that strength is found in evidence that will cast doubt as to the commission of the offense charged against your client.

3.       Identify the legal parameters and limitations of each side of the case

Each side is limited by a specific set of rules. Lawyers must remember that each there are State-specific rules of evidence. Knowing what these are will help counsels craft questions for direct and cross-examination.